Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://dspace.nlu.edu.ua//jspui/handle/123456789/7647| Title: | Законодавча влада у парламентській республіці |
| Other Titles: | Законодательная власть в парламентской республике Legislative power in parliamentary republic |
| Authors: | Процюк, І.В. |
| Keywords: | парламентська республіка законодавча влада парламент виконавча влада уряд парламентський контроль недовіра уряду розпуск парламенту президент парламентская республика недоверие правительству парламентская форма правления законодательная власть исполнительная власть правительство парламентский контроль роспуск парламента parliamentary republic legislative power parliament executive power parliamentary control no confidence in government dissolution of parliament president |
| Issue Date: | 2014 |
| Citation: | Процюк І. В. Законодавча влада у парламентській республіці / І. В. Процюк // Державне будівництво та місцеве самоврядування : зб. наук. пр. – Харків, 2014. – Вип. 27. – С. 22–38. |
| Abstract: | У статті аналізуються головні ознаки парламентської республіки, розглядаються місце і роль законодавчої влади в таких республіках, ураховуючи особливості поділу влади з урахуванням трьох аспектів: інституційного, функціонального і суб’єктного. Особлива увага звертається на питання взаємодії і взаємовідносин між парламентом і урядом у парламентських республіках, розглядаються переваги і недоліки моделей поділу влади в них. В статье анализируются основные признаки парламентской республики, рассматриваются место и роль законодательной власти в таких республиках, учитывая особенности разделения власти с учетом трех аспектов: институционного, функционального и субъектного. Особое внимание обращено на вопрос взаимодействия и взаимоотношений между парламентом и правительством в парламентских республиках, рассматриваются достоинства и недостатки моделей разделения власти в них. |
| Description: | The paper examines the main reasons for the formation of parliamentary republics in certain countries, the main features of such republics are analyzed: the leading role of parliament among the higher bodies of state power and vague consolidation of theory of separation of powers and checks and balances between branches of government. In is thus indicated that the state power in parliamentary republics is realized on the principle of the separation into legislative, executive and judicial on the basis of soft (flexible) consolidation of the principle. However, parliament dominates over the government’s authority. The basic model of separation of state power in a parliamentary republic is the one that is regarded in 3 aspects: institutional, functional and subjective. The institutional aspect means that there are three branches of government – legislative, executive and judicial – with systems of relevant government authorities for execution of their power. The legislative one is represented by a parliament, which is formed on the basis of the popular vote. Legislative body – the parliament in parliamentary republics is not only engaged in lawmaking, but also has the authority to form the executive and the judicial bodies. Thus, the executive and judicial branches of government are derivatives from the power of the legislature. Parliament usually elects the president and forms government itself or expresses confidence to the government, appointed by the president. Specificity of parliament is that although the president and the government are formed by parliament, they act as institutions relatively independent from it. Support of institutional autonomy (albeit relative) of the parliament (lower chamber) and the government is shown by a situation, where the government loses the support of the parliamentary majority and is trying to govern without its support. Subjective component also has a certain empirical value for a comprehensive study and taking into account practice of realization of the model of separation of state powers in parliamentary form of state government. The major signs of subject aspect, which are derived from the institutional design of the model of separation of state powers in parliamentary countries is that parliamentary mandates are compatible with the positions of prime minister or a member of the government, and the one source of formation (by the parliament) of higher state and government institutions (government, president) creates conditions for various institutions to be controlled by the same political groups (parties). The functional aspect is manifested in the functional independence of the branches of government from each other, but at the same time in their mutual competential interaction, in balancing, competential limitation (interpenetration) and control. Parliament has no right to exercise executive and judicial functions, the courts execute judicial function, but do not have the right to substitute a legislator and executive bodies; executive institutions are «programmed» to perform executive power functions. It is in this component that checks and balances are provided. Advantages and disadvantages of the parliamentary form of government are defined in the final part of the article, and also the author’s opinion concerning possibility of fixing such form of government in Ukraine is expressed. |
| URI: | https://dspace.nlu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/7647 |
| Appears in Collections: | Наукові статті кафедри теорії держави і права |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Protsyuk_22.pdf | 403.96 kB | Adobe PDF |  View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.