Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.nlu.edu.ua//jspui/handle/123456789/20138
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMelnyk, S.en
dc.contributor.authorIgnatieva, A.I.en
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-10T11:58:57Z-
dc.date.available2024-09-10T11:58:57Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationMelnyk S. International experience in coordinating the action of law enforcement agencies / S. Melnyk, A. Ignatievа // Міжнародний науковий журнал “Інтернаука”. Серія: Юридичні науки = International scientific journal "Internauka". Series: Juridical Sciences. – 2022. – №1. – DOI: https://doi.org/10.25313/2520-2308-2022-1-7837.en
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.25313/2520-2308-2022-1-7837-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.nlu.edu.ua//jspui/handle/123456789/20138-
dc.description.abstractThe article researched international experience in coordinating the action of law enforcement agencies in modern international law. It is stated that, enforcement agencies are those institutions that enforce the laws, including election-related laws. Enforcement аs an important integrity mechanism as it deters those who might be interested in subverting the system as well as identifies and punishes those who have broken the law. The responsibilities for enforcing laws and codes are usually divided among different agencies, depending on the nature and severity of the problem. Initial investigations may start with the oversight agency, but can be referred to an enforcement agency if it was determined that legal enforcement was required. For example, potential criminal cases uncovered during a routine audit can be referred to the justice system. If the prosecuting authorities decide to pursue the case, they could charge and prosecute the alleged perpetrator, with a court pronouncing sentence if the defendant were found guilty. Jurisdictionally, there can be an important difference between international law enforcement agencies and multinational law enforcement agencies, even though both are often referred to as «international», even in official documents Effective enforcement requires a functioning legal system and a respect for the rule of law. An important factor in maintaining integrity in enforcement is the independence of the judiciary, as justice is supposed to be administered fairly, equally and impartially. The prevention, investigation and cessation of international and many domestic crimes, as well as the prosecution of those responsible for their commission, are not it is always possible alone, without the help of other states and international organizations. Achieving this goalrequires states not only to proclaim unilateral declarations of intent, participation in the signing international treaties and the activities of international institutions, but also the actual implementation of joint and agreed activities aimed at combating transnational and domestic organized crime.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherНЮУ ім. Ярослава Мудрогоuk_UA
dc.subjectinternational experienceen
dc.subjectlaw enforcement agenciesen
dc.subjectlegal systemen
dc.subjectlegal valuesen
dc.subjectresponsibilityen
dc.subjectміжнародний досвідuk_UA
dc.subjectправоохоронні органиuk_UA
dc.subjectсистема праваuk_UA
dc.subjectправові цінностіuk_UA
dc.subjectвідповідальністьuk_UA
dc.titleInternational experience in coordinating the action of law enforcement agenciesen
dc.title.alternativeМіжнародний досвід координації дій правоохоронних органівuk_UA
dc.typeArticleen
Appears in Collections:Наукові статті Військово-юридичного інституту

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Ignatieva_2022-1.pdf261.99 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.