Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://dspace.nlu.edu.ua//jspui/handle/123456789/11447| Title: | Самовизначення індивіда у полі правової культури: ідентичність чи імідж? |
| Authors: | Мелякова, Ю.В. |
| Keywords: | національно-культурна ідентичність мультикультуралізм правова культура полікультурність самовизначення індивіда конфлікт ідентичностей симуляція ідентичності імідж праворозуміння креативний децентрований індивід национально-культурная идентичность мультикультурализм правовая культура поликультурность самоопределение индивида конфликт идентичностей симуляция идентичности имидж правопонимание креативный децентрированный индивид national-cultural identity multiculturalism legal culture conflict of identities individual self-determination understanding of law simulation of identity image communication and creative individual |
| Issue Date: | 2016 |
| Publisher: | видавництво "Право" |
| Citation: | Мелякова Ю. В. Самовизначення індивіда у полі правової культури: ідентичність чи імідж? / Ю. В. Мелякова // Вісник Національного університету «Юридична академія України імені Ярослава Мудрого». Серія: Філософія. – Харків, 2016. – № 4. – С. 54–71. |
| Abstract: | Дослідження присвячено соціально-правовій і антропологічній проблемі особистісного й правового самовизначення людини нестабільного полікультурного суспільства у національному, громадянському, ідеологічному й ментальному планах. Політико-правова ситуація в сучасній Україні постає як дискурс ідентичностей, мультикультурність в межах однієї політичної нації, конфлікт світоглядів і, як наслідок, симуляція ідентичності. Самоідентифікація постсучасної особистості формує креативний імідж, що дозволяє їй чутливо пристосовуватися до віртуальності права. |
| Description: | The article addresses the socio-legal and anthropological problem of personal people self-determination of open the transgressive society in national-cultural, civil, ideological and mental planes. The legal and political situation in modern Ukraine acts as a discourse of identity, the multiculturalism in the framework of one political nation, the conflict of worldviews and, as a consequence, the simulation of identity. Identity post-modern identity forms the image of a creative, sensitive allowing it to adjust to the virtuality of law. Simulation of identity, which is cynically by many persons forced to make a choice becomes a cause for them morbid self-destruction, the impossibility of spiritual self-realization. This situation escalates the internal conflict in society – the rift on the outsiders, those who aspire to be misfits. Humane way to solve this conflict is legal. Right, if it is truly democratic and humane, should equally guarantee the rights and opportunities of all parties to the social discourse. Alternative war as violence is the rule of law in the liberal value of the contract. Scientists hope to avoid excessive “Eniseli”, they take the perspective of transnational identity, global peace, following the example of developed democratic States of the West. Globalization adds another dimension to the process of finding identity. Globalization not only blurs the traditional identities associated with family, history, place of residence, nation, religion, not only of identity, elaborated in the period of formation of industrial society (labour collective, class, Corporation), and such that are associated with the nation-state. Globalization is reshaping the social, cultural, psychological, moral forms of human existence. Lost the stability, the certainty of the individual in the social environment. Break established ties and traditional identity. Accordingly, increases the overall uncertainty of life, this causes confusion of people, because he loses confidence in the reliability of the surrounding world. The world is formed without a support, in which it is difficult to determine priorities and an unambiguous ideological orientation. A new identity is formed in the bowels of the network society. Previous forms of involvement in sustainable communities, a stable structured environment and traditional culture in such a society give way to the ephemeral forms that change all the time. Topical method of organization and understanding of contemporary anthropological structure and simultaneously a new form of identification of the individual is deconstruction. Philosophers have concluded the replacement of depth and hierarchy of identity – simulation in a variety of forms: simulacrum, the image, the mask, the avatar. The post-modern identity of the individual loses its usual promise of depth, rootedness in tradition, fundamentalism and stationarity. Unconventional identity (the image) corresponds anthropologically deconstructive personality. Modern reality, including legal, is an anthropological system. The structural unity of this reality is a person who is in a permanent state of fulfillment and adaptation to changing global realities. The personality identifies itself and creates an environment of personal freedom, and so self-fulfilling. The trend of globalization provokes uncertainty, which continues the search for new forms of identity. People lose their sense of belonging to a spiritually close environment, certain well-established values and guidelines. Globalization is blurring not only traditional identity, but also the mechanism of their formation. Identification begins to be permanent and unfinished, as a way of being human in this virtual space. The creativity of the individual is aimed at the deconstruction of their own world that meets his needs. The rationale for the current image is through games with the ancestral myths. The image is an irresponsible imitation of the anthropological essence of the individual – pure simulative way. A plurality of non-natural images does not burden the individual's historicity, but rather limitless potential. This anthropology radically alters the content and methods of understanding law and legal identity. The self-identification of personality in cultural, ethnic, social relations is the recognition and justification of the identity of their natural rights, especially the right to be proud of their genealogy and civil history. But it is the usual interpretation of “identity” is contrary to models of modern networked changeable and global peace, which exists as a hyperreality off-center individuals. In turn, the fact of the inertness of the consciousness of many poorly adapted individuals transforms ontological contradiction of man and environment in such forms as the crisis of identity, marginalization of certain groups. |
| URI: | https://dspace.nlu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/11447 |
| Appears in Collections: | Наукові статті кафедри філософії |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Melyakova_54-71.pdf | 402.78 kB | Adobe PDF |  View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.