Дискусійні питання встановлення відповідальності за проступок

Abstract

Розглядаються питання обґрунтування доцільності впровадження проступку, а також основні концептуальні положення норм матеріального і процесуального права про проступок.
Рассматриваются вопросы обоснования целесообразности внедрения проступка, а также основные концептуальные положения норм материального и процессуального права о проступке.

Description

Different approaches concerning the solution of question of reasonability to establish responsibility for misdemeanour in the currently existing legislation of Ukraine are analyzed, as well as main conceptual positions of material and procedural law norms studying misdemeanors. Positions of legislative proposal of Law of Ukraine N 4712 from April 16, 2014 are criticized. The main idea of this law project concerning establishing responsibility for misdemeanour in terms of Criminal Code of Ukraine seems doubtful. In connection with this, propositions about substitution of concept ‘criminality of act’ for ‘criminal wrongfulness’ seem unjustified, as well as about category of ‘criminal wrongful act’ implementation including such of its types as crime, misdemeanour etc. Such innovations will inevitably lead to considerable expanding of boundaries of criminalization, as according to the approach suggested, those acts nowadays considered as administrative delinquencies will be considered as crimes. Another conceptual regulations of law project involving main statutory regulations of currently existing criminal legislation of Ukraine are criticized as well. A more appropriate solution concerning introduction of ‘misdemeanour’ category into Ukrainian legislation by way of legal enacting of separate normative act, The Misdemeanour Law (Code) of Ukraine, is suggested. Main conceptual regulations of this normative act are presented.

Citation

Дискусійні питання встановлення відповідальності за проступок / В. Тацій [та ін.] // Вісник Національної академії правових наук України : зб. наук. пр. – Харків, 2014. – № 2. – С. 122-135.

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By