Çàâäàííÿ òà íàâ÷àëüí³ òåêñòè
äî ïðàêòè÷íèõ çàíÿòü
 
ç àíãë³éñüêî¿ ìîâè
äëÿ ñòóäåíò³â ôàêóëüòåòó ï³äãîòîâêè þðèñò³â
äëÿ ÌÇÑ Óêðà¿íè
(3 êóðñ, îñíîâíà ìîâà)
 
2004

 

 

Çàâäàííÿ òà íàâ÷àëüí³ òåêñòè äî ïðàêòè÷íèõ çàíÿòü ç àíãë³éñüêî¿ ìîâè äëÿ ñòóäåíò³â ôàêóëüòåòó ï³äãîòîâêè þðèñò³â äëÿ ÌÇÑ Óêðà¿íè (3 êóðñ, îñíîâíà ìîâà): Çàâäàííÿ äî ïðàêòè÷íèõ çàíÿòü /Óêëàä. Ïåòóõîâà Î.²., Ðîìàíþê Ñ.Ì., Ñîðîêà Í.À., Çàéäà Â.Â..- Õ.: Íàö. þðèä. àêàä. Óêðà¿íè, 2004.- 31 ñ.

 

 

T E R M  V

 

Topic: POLITICAL PARTIES & ELECTIONS

Lessons 1-24

 

POLITICAL PARTIES IN UKRAINE

 

Until October 1990 the only legal political party was the Communist Party of Ukraine (CPU), which was a branch of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (CPSU). Major legislation approved by the Ukrainian Supreme Soviet originated in, or was approved by, the CPU. Indigenous opposition to the Communist Party crystallised in an organisation called the People's Rukh of Ukraine for Reconstruction, or Rukh, in 1989. Consisting of an array of religious, nationalist, and cultural groups, Rukh succeeded in electing one-quarter of the deputies to the Supreme Council in March 1990. With the removal of Article 6 from the Ukrainian constitution in October 1990 (which had protected the CPU from competition), nascent political parties were officially recognised. A wide array of political parties has emerged. On the far right, neofascist and extreme nationalist parties have gained strength and are represented in the Supreme Council.

Rukh is the most prominent of a large group of moderate nationalist and centrist parties. An alliance of leftist groups, led by the Ukrainian Communist Party (legalised in 1993 after being banned in 1991), remains the most powerful bloc in the Supreme Council.

Ukraine has many other registered political parties: the Ukrainian Republican Party favours free enterprises; the Christian Democratic Party promotes religious issues; the Peasant-Democratic Party represents agricultural concerns; the Socialist Party stands for Socialist orientation; the Democratic Party of Ukraine supports democratic political development.

Fractions: Our Ukraine, Congress of Ukrainian Nationalists, Party of Reform and Order, Social-Democratic of Ukraine United, Labour Party and others. 

 

POLITICAL PARTIES IN THE USA

 

There are two major political parties, the Democratic Party and the Republican Party. Other parties have occasionally challenged these two, but without permanent success. One reason for their failure is that in order to win a national election, a party must appeal to a broad base of voters and a wide spectrum of interests.

The two major parties thus tend to be moderate in their programs, and there may often be little difference between them on some issues. Each has a conservative wing, and each has a wing that is considered liberal. The conservative Democrats tend to be more conservative on racial issues, for example, than their Republican counterparts; the liberal Democrats are more radical on economic issues than the liberal Republicans.

The national parties contest presidential elections every four years, but between their quadrennial national conventions, they are often little more than loose alliances of state and local party organizations.

In elections for president and vice president, voters actually choose among electors committed to the support of a particular candidate, a system called the Electoral College. Each state is allotted one electoral vote for each senator and representative in Congress.

At the state level, political parties reflect the diversity of the population. Large urban centers are more likely to support a Democratic ticket, whereas rural areas, small cities, and suburban areas tend more often to vote Republican. In many states rural areas and smaller towns control the state legislatures, even though the more populous city areas provide the greater proportion of tax revenue. A Supreme Court ruling in 1964 sought to remedy this situation by ordering states to reapportion their legislatures more closely by population. Some states have traditionally given majorities to one particular party. Until the mid-20th century, for example, the 11 Southern states of the old Confederacy voted almost solidly for Democratic candidates; in other states, such as Maine and South Dakota, Republicans are more likely to win.

Municipal political parties have a pyramidal structure based, at the lowest level, on districts or precincts. The leaders of these units are responsible to ward leaders, who form the governing body of the municipal party. All of these party functionaries are responsible for getting their voters to the polls at election time, often on the basis of a return for services rendered. It is to them, after all, that voters have gone with requests for better municipal services, jobs, and assistance in minor difficulties. One route to political office for the ordinary citizen has traditionally been through the organization: belonging to a neighborhood party club, helping to raise funds, getting out the vote, watching the polls, and gradually rising through the system to committeeman, city councilman, representative to the state legislature, or depending on chance, talent, political expediency, and a host of other factors to higher positions.

As society has become increasingly urban, politics and government have become more complex. Many problems of the cities, including the problems of transportation, housing, education, health, and welfare, can no longer be handled entirely on the local level. Since even the states do not have the necessary resources, cities have often turned to the federal government for assistance.

 

POLITICAL PARTIES IN GREAT BRITAIN

 

A two-party system has existed in the United Kingdom since the late 17th century. From the mid-1920s the dominant groupings have been the Conservative Party and the Labour Party, despite the existence of smaller parties such as the Liberal Democratic Party (which includes the rump of the former Liberal Party) and the Social Democratic Party.

The two-party system is one of the outstanding features of British politics and has generally produced firm and decisive government. The practice of simple majority voting and the establishment of single-member constituencies of uniform population size have tended to exaggerate the majority of the winning party and thus to eliminate third parties. The two-party system, together with uncertainty about the timing of a general election, has produced the British phenomenon of the Opposition. Its decisive characteristic is that it attempts to form an alternative government, ready at any time to take office, in recognition of which the leader of the Opposition is paid an official salary.

The first Conservative government was formed by Sir Robert Peel, whose program, set out in the Tamworth Manifesto (1834), stressed the timely reform of abuses, the importance of law and order and of the police, an orderly system of taxation, and the importance both of landed interests and of trade and industry. Prospects of an extended period of Conservative rule disappeared in 1846 when the party split over the repeal of the Corn Laws, and, from that time until the formation of the Liberal-Conservative coalition government in 1915, political power alternated between the Conservatives and the Liberals.

With the Conservatives' victory over Labour in 1979, Thatcher's philosophy translated itself into a series of efforts to "roll back the state" in the economic sphere, to weaken the power of the trade unions, and to curb welfare provisions. Thatcher combined this program with moral traditionalism and nationalistic resentment of the European Union (EU). Critics both inside and outside the Conservative Party contended that the "cult of the market" did much to disintegrate the social order, yet Thatcher was able to lead her party to resounding victories in the general elections of 1983 and 1987. When she was finally forced to resign the party's leadership (and therefore the prime ministry) in 1990, it reflected the combined impact of a number of factors. Among these were: public protests over a proposal to finance local government through a flat-rate "poll tax"; a series of bitter conflicts with some of Thatcher's senior ministers; her strident and authoritarian style of dealing with colleagues; and a growing sense among backbenchers that she might prove unable to withstand the electoral challenge of a newly united and considerably reformed Labour Party.

Thatcher's successor, John Major, had held senior ministerial office for only a brief period prior to his elevation to the prime ministry. Major's less election of 1992, but he had to contend with a prolonged economic recession, internal party conflict over the question of European integration, and dismally low opinion-poll ratings. The Conservatives suffered a crushing loss in the general election of 1997, losing more than half their seats in Parliament. A return to opposition did little to promise an end to the factional strife that had characterised the party during its last years in power.

British political party whose historic links with trade unions have led it to promote an active role for the state in the creation of economic prosperity and in the provision of social services. In opposition to the Conservative Party, it has been the major democratic socialist party in Britain since the early 20th century.

 

ELECTIONS

 

Election is the formal process of selecting a person for public office or accepting or rejecting a political proposition by voting. The widespread use of elections in the modern world has its origins in the gradual emergence of representative government in Europe and North America since the 17th century. Elections provide a means of making political choices by voting. This conception of elections implies that the voters are presented with alternatives, that they can choose among a number of proposals designed to settle an issue of public concern. The presence of alternatives is a necessary condition, for, although electoral forms may be employed to demonstrate popular support for incumbent leaders and their policies, the absence of alternatives disqualifies such devices as genuine elections.

Fundamental to the use of elections is the contribution that they make to democratic government. Where the members of the body politic cannot themselves govern and must entrust government to representatives, elections serve not only to select leaders acceptable to the voters but also to hold the leaders accountable for their performance in office. Accountability, however, is greatly jeopardized in electoral situations in which elected leaders, for want of ambition, do not care whether or not they are re-elected or in situations in which, for historical or other reasons, one party is so predominant as to preclude effective choice among alternate candidates or policies.    

Nevertheless, the possibility of controlling leaders by requiring them to submit to regular and periodic elections contributes to solving the problem of succession in leadership and, thereby, to the continuation of democracy. Moreover, where the electoral process is competitive and forces candidates or parties to expose their record of accomplishment and future intentions to popular scrutiny in election campaigns, elections serve as forums for the discussion of public issues, facilitate the expression of public opinion, and, more generally, permit an exchange of influence between governors and governed.

Elections also serve to reinforce the stability and legitimacy of the political community in which they take place. Like national holidays commemorating common experiences, elections serve to link the members of a body politic to each other and thereby confirm the viability of the political community. By mobilizing masses of voters in a common act of governance, elections lend authority and legitimacy to the acts of those who wield power in the name of the people.

Elections can also confirm the worth and dignity of the individual citizen as a human being. Whatever other needs he may have, participation in an election serves to gratify the voter's sense of self-esteem and self-respect. It gives him an opportunity to have his say, and he can, through expressing partisanship and even through nonvoting, satisfy his sense of belonging to or alienation from the political community. Rallies, banners, posters, buttons, headlines, and television call attention to the importance of participation in the event.

Candidates and parties, from right to left, in addition to propagating their policy objectives through rhetoric and slogans, invoke the symbols of nationalism or patriotism, reform or revolution, past glory or future promise. Whatever the peculiar national, regional, or local variations, elections are events that, by arousing emotions and channeling them toward collective symbols, break the monotony of daily life and focus attention on the common fate.

Systems of counting votes Individual votes are totaled into collective decisions by a wide variety of rules of counting that voters and leaders have accepted as legitimate prior to the election. These decision rules may call for plurality voting, which requires that, among three or more alternatives, the winner need have only the highest number of votes; simple majority voting, which requires that the winner receive more than 50 percent of the vote; extraordinary majority voting, which requires some higher proportion for the winner, such as a two-thirds vote; or unanimity.

Plurality and majority decision The simplest means of deciding an election is the plurality rule. To win, a candidate need only poll more votes than any other single opponent; he need not, as required by the majority formula, poll more votes than the combined opposition. The more candidates contesting a constituency seat, the greater the probability that the winning candidate will receive less than 50 percent of the vote. The plurality formula is used in the national elections of such countries as Great Britain, Canada, and New Zealand.

Under the majority rule, the party or candidate winning more than 50 percent of the vote in a constituency is awarded the contested seat. The winning party or candidate must poll more votes than the combined opposition. This system thus ensures that the elected representative has the support of the majority of the voters. The majority formula is employed in Australia and France. It is usually applied only within single-member electoral constituencies.

Both the plurality and the majority-decision rules are employed in the election of U.S. presidents. The composition of the Electoral College, which actually elects the president, is determined by a plurality vote taken within each state. Voters choose between the names of the presidential candidates, but they are in effect choosing the electors who will elect the president by means of a majority vote in the Electoral College. All of a state's electoral votes (which are equal in number to its seats in Congress) are given to the presidential candidate who gains a plurality of the vote in the state election. It is thus possible for a president to be elected on the basis of a minority of the popular vote. A critical difficulty with the majority formula is that, in a multiparty political system, the formula may produce an electoral deadlock if no candidate secures 50 percent of the total vote. In order to break such deadlocks a second round of elections (second ballot) is required, if no candidate obtains a majority on the first round.

Neither the majority nor the plurality formulas distribute legislative seats in proportion to the share of the popular vote won by the competing parties. Both formulas tend to award the strongest party disproportionately and to handicap the weaker parties. The latter is particularly true if small parties are rooted in ethnic, religious, or social minorities; small parties escape the inequities of the electoral system only if they have a regionally concentrated base. The plurality formula distorts the distribution of seats more than the majority system.

Plurality system is an electoral process in which the candidate who polls more votes than any other candidate is elected. It is distinguished from the majority system, in which, to win, a candidate must receive more votes than all other candidates combined. Election by a plurality is the most common method of selecting candidates for public office.

Advantages of the plurality system are that it is easily understood by voters, provides a quick decision, and is more convenient and less costly to operate than other methods. The main argument against it is that in an election with more than two candidates, it may result in the election of a candidate who has received only a minority of the votes cast: for example, in a closely contested election with four candidates, the total required to win by a plurality could be as little as 25 percent of the total vote plus one. To overcome this disadvantage, alternative devices, such as election by an absolute majority and proportional representation, are used. The plurality method operates best under a two-party system.

Election by a plurality is not limited to government; it is commonly used in the selection of officers in such large organizations as trade unions and professional associations and also in arriving at decisions at meetings of boards of directors and trustees.

     Compulsory voting In some nations, notably Australia and Belgium, electoral participation is legally required of all citizens, and non-voters without legitimate excuses face money fines. The concept of compulsory voting reflects a strain in democratic theory in which voting is considered not merely a right but a duty. Its purpose is to ensure the electoral equality of all social groups.

Balloting The ballot makes secret voting possible. Its initial use seems to have been a means to reduce irregularities and deception in elections. This objective, however, could be achieved only if the ballot was not supplied by the voter himself, as was the case in much early voting by secret ballot, or by political parties, as is still the case in some countries.

Ballot procedures differ widely, ranging from marking the names of preferred candidates to crossing out those not preferred or writing in the names of persons who are not formal candidates. Ballots also differ according to the type of voting system employed. Where plurality or majority voting is practiced, most elections employ classified ballots whereby the voter casts his vote for only one candidate or list of candidates. Where proportional methods are used, election is by ballots that enable the voter to rank the candidates according to his preferences.

Ballot position is likely to have its greatest impact in nonpartisan elections, primaries, and elections for minor offices. On party-column ballots it is possible to vote a "straight ticket" for all of a party's candidates by entering a single mark, although voting for individual candidates is usually possible. On the other hand, on the office-bloc ballot, voting is for individual candidates grouped by office rather than party. This discourages, though it does not eliminate, voting exclusively for members of one party. This can have important consequences for the structure of government, especially in systems with separated powers and federal territorial organization.

Electoral College in the United States is a group of electors chosen within each state to elect the president and vice president. Each state has as many presidential electors as it has representatives in both houses of Congress. As originally planned by the framers of the Constitution, the electors actually choose the president. The framers preferred this to a direct popular election because, at a time when travel was difficult and there were no national party organizations, they feared that many regional candidates would divide the vote. Requiring a candidate to win a majority in the Electoral College was a way of obtaining a national consensus.

Although the Constitution still allows electors to use their discretion, electors now are usually pledged to support a party's candidate. All the states, except Maine and Nebraska, hold a winner-take-all popular vote for electors. Whichever candidate wins a plurality in a state wins all the electoral votes in that state. With the winner-take-all system, elected presidents receive a greater percentage of the electoral vote than of the popular vote.

Primary in the United States is an election to select the candidates who will run for public office. Primaries may be closed (partisan), so that only declared party members may vote; or they may be open (non-partisan), so that voters choose which party's primary they wish to vote in without declaring any party affiliation.

Closed primaries may be direct or indirect. A direct primary functions as a preliminary election whereby voters decide on their party's ticket; some form of direct primary is now used in all U.S. states. In an indirect primary, voters elect delegates who choose the party's candidates at a nominating convention.

The presidential primaries held in many states are indirect primaries. In most presidential primaries, the delegates elected are bound and pledged (Republicans by some state rules, Democrats by national party rules) to vote in a way that reflects the preferences of the voters. Delegates may be bound for only one ballot or until released by the candidate. In some states, the presidential preference vote is advisory and does not bind the delegates.

 

Tasks: 1. Evans V., Dooley J. Enerprise (Intermediate) Level 4.

            Course Book. – London, 2000. – Unit 7.

  2. Evans V., Dooley J. Enerprise (Intermediate) Level 4.

  Work Book. – London, 2000. – Unit 7.

  3. Evans V., Dooley J. Enerprise (Intermediate) Level 4.

  Grammar Book. – London, 2000. – Unit 7.

 4. Evans V., Dooley J. Enerprise (Intermediate) Level 4.

  Course Book. – London, 2000. – Unit 7.Word List.

  5.  Evans V., Dooley J. Enerprise (Intermediate) Level 4.

  Student’s Casstte. – London, 2000. – Unit 7.

  6. Riley A. Law Book: Professional English. – London,

  1999. Units 3, 4, 6, 9.

 

 

Topic: ENVIRONMENT: PROBLEMS & PROTECTION

Lessons 25-36

 

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION

 

Environmental pollution is a term that refers to all the ways by which people pollute their surroundings. People dirty the air with gases and smoke, poison the water with chemicals and other substances, and dam­age the soil with too many fertilizers and pesti­cides. People also pollute their surroundings in various other ways. For example, they ruin natu­ral beauty by scattering junk and litter on the land and in the water. They operate machines and mo­tor vehicles that fill the air with disturbing noise. Nearly everyone causes environmental pollution in some way.

Environmental pollution is one of the most se­rious problems facing humanity today. Air, wa­ter, and soil all harmed by pollution are neces­sary to the survival of all living things. Badly pol­luted air can cause illness, and even death. Polluted water kills fish and other marine life. Pollution of soil reduces the amount of land that is available for growing food. In addition, environmental pollution also brings ugliness to our naturally beautiful world.

Everyone wants to reduce pollution. But the pol­lution problem is as complicated as it is serious, it is complicated because much pollution is caused by things that benefit people. For example, exhaust from automobiles causes a large percentage of all air pollution. But the automobile provides trans­portation for millions of people. Factories discharge much of the material that pollutes air and water, but factories provide jobs for people and produce goods that people want. Too much fertilizer or pesticide can ruin soil, but fertilizers and pesticides are important aids to the growing of crops.

Thus, to end or greatly reduce pollution immediately people would have to stop using many things that benefit them. Most people do not want to do that, of course. But pollution can be gradually reduced in several ways. Scientists and engineers can work to find ways to lessen the amount of pollution that such things as automobiles and factories cause. Governments can pass and enforce laws that require businesses and indi­viduals to stop, or cut down on, certain polluting activities. And per­haps most importantly individuals and groups of people can work to persuade their representatives in government, and also persuade busi­nesses, to take action toward reducing pollution.

People have always polluted their surroundings. But throughout much of history, pollution was not a major problem. Most people lived in uncrowned rural areas, and the pollutants (waste products) they produced were widely scattered. People had no pollution-causing machines or motor ve­hicles. The development of crowded industrial cities in the 1700's and 1800's made pollution a major problem. People and factories in these cities put huge amounts of pollutants into small areas. During the 1900s, urban ar­eas continued to develop, and automobiles and other new inventions made pollution steadily worse. By the mid-1900s, pollution had affected the wa­ter in every major lake and river and the air over every major city in the United States and other industrial countries. Since the late 1960s, millions of people have become alarmed by the dangers of pollution, and scientific studies have improved our understanding of the problem. Large numbers of people are now working to reduce environmental pollution.

 

KINDS OF POLLUTION

 

There are several kinds of environmental pollution. They include air pollution, water pollution, soil pollution, and pollution caused by solid wastes, noise, and radiation.

All parts of the environment are closely related to one another. The study of the relationships among living things, and between living things and other parts of the environment, is called ecology. Because of the close relationships, a kind of pollution that chiefly harms one part of the envi­ronment may also affect others. For example, air pollution harms the air. But rain washes pollutants out of the air and deposits them on the land and in bodies of water. Wind, on the other hand, blows pollutants off the land and into the air.

Air pollution turns clear, odorless air into hazy, smelly air that harms health, kills plants, and damages property. People cause air pollution both outdoors and indoors. Outdoor air pollution results from pouring hun­dreds of millions of tons of gases and particulates (tiny particles of liquid or solid matter) into the atmosphere each year. One of the most common forms of out-door air pollution is smog. Indoor air pollution results from many of the same substances found outdoors. But indoor pollutants can present a more serious problem because they tend to build up in a small area from which they cannot easily escape. Cigarette smoke is a familiar indoor air pollutant.

Most air pollution results from combustion (burning) processes. The burning of gasoline to power motor vehicles and the burning of coal to heat buildings and help manufacture products are examples of such pro­cesses. Each time a fuel is burned in a combustion process, some type of pollutant is released into the air. The pollutants range from small amounts of colorless poison gas to clouds of thick black smoke. Weather condi­tions can help reduce the amount of pollutants in outdoor air. Wind scat­ters pollutants, and rain and snow wash them into the ground. But in many areas, pollutants are put into the air faster than weather conditions can dispose of them. In crowded cities, for example, thousands of auto­mobiles, factories, and furnaces may add tons of pollutants to a small area of the atmosphere each day.

At times, weather conditions cause pollutants to build up over an area instead of clearing them away. One such condition – called thermal inver­sion – occurs when a layer of warm air settles over a layer of cooler air that lies near the ground. The warm air holds down the cool air and prevents pollutants from rising and scattering. A serious pollution prob­lem results when a thermal inversion occurs over a city that is pouring tons of pollutants into the air.

One serious result of air pollution is its harmful effect on human health. Both gases and particulates burn people's eyes and irritate their lungs. Particulates can settle in the lungs and worsen such respiratory diseases as asthma, bronchitis, and pneumonia. Studies have shown that particu­lates help cause such diseases as cancer and emphysema. In cities through­out the world, long periods of heavy air pollution have caused illness and death rates to increase dramatically.

Air pollution also harms plants. Poisonous gases in the air can restrict the growth of, and eventually kill, nearly all kinds of plants. Forests in Tennessee, citrus groves near Los Angeles, and vegetable gardens in New Jersey have all been seriously damaged by air pollution.

Most materials get dirty and wear out more quickly in polluted air than in clean air. Polluted air even harms such hard and strong materials as concrete and steel. In some cities, statues and other art objects that stood out-doors for centuries have been moved indoors because air pol­lution threatened to destroy them.

Air pollutants may also affect climate. Both gases and particulates can cause changes in the average temperatures of an area. Particulates scatter the sun's rays and reduce the amount of sunlight that reaches the ground. Such interference with sunlight may cause average temperatures in an area to drop. Some gases, including carbon dioxide, allow sunlight to reach the ground, but prevent the sunlight's heat from rising out of the atmosphere and flowing back into space. The warming of the earth's sur­face that results is called the greenhouse effect. The burning of fuel and other polluting activities are increasing the amount of heat-trapping gases in the atmosphere. This development may intensify the greenhouse ef­fect, causing average temperatures to rise.

In addition, air pollutants may damage the layer of ozone (a form of oxygen) in the earth's upper atmosphere. The ozone layer protects ani­mals and plants from much of the sun's harmful ultraviolet light.

Water pollution reduces the amount of pure, fresh water that is avail­able for such necessities as drinking and cleaning, and for such activities as swimming and fishing. The pollutants that affect water come mainly from industries, farms, and sewerage systems.

Industries dump huge amounts of wastes into bodies of water each year. These wastes include chemicals, wastes from animal and plant mat­ter, and hundreds of other substances. Some of the wastes may be haz­ardous (harmful to human health). Industries dispose of much hazardous waste in dump sites on land. But improperly managed sites may leak the wastes into underground water supplies that people use.

Wastes from farms include animal wastes, fertilizers, and pesticides. Most of these materials drain off farm fields and into nearby bodies of water.

Sewerage systems carry wastes from homes, offices, and industries into water. Nearly all cities have waste treatment plants that remove some of the most harmful wastes from sewage. But even most of the treated sewage contains material that harms water.

Natural cycles work to absorb small amounts of wastes in bodies of water. During a cycle, wastes are turned into useful, or at least harmless, substances. Bacteria called aerobic bacteria use oxygen to decay natural wastes such as dead fish and break them down into chemicals, including nitrates, phosphates, and carbon dioxide. These chemicals, called nutri­ents, are used as food by algae (simple organisms) and green plants in the water. The algae serve as food for microscopic animals called zooplankton. Small fish, such as minnows, eat the zooplankton. The small fish, in turn, are eaten by larger fish, which eventually die and are broken down by bacteria. The cycle then begins again.

The same natural cycles work on wastes poured into water by people. Bacteria break down chemicals and other wastes and turn them into nu­trients, or else into substances that will not harm fish or sea plants. How­ever, if too much waste matter is poured into the water, the whole cycle will begin to break down, and the water becomes dirtier and dirtier. The bacteria that work to decay the wastes use up too much oxygen during the decaying process. As a result, less oxygen is available for the animals and plants that live in the water. Animals and plants then die, adding even more wastes to the water. Finally, the water's entire oxygen supply is used up.

Nutrients in water cause a similar processcalled nutrient enrichment, or eutrophicationto take place. Nutrients that people add to water, such as nitrates from agricultural fertilizers and phosphates from detergents in sewage, greatly increase the growth of algae in water. As larger amounts of algae grow, larger amounts also die. The dead algae become wastes, and, as they decay, they use up the water's oxygen supply. The addition of heated water to a body of water also upsets cycles. Heated water can kill animals and plants that are accustomed to living at lower tempera­tures. It also reduces the amount of oxygen that water can hold. The addition of heated water is called thermal pollution. Most heated water comes from industries and power plants that use water for cooling.

Another major pollutant is fuel oil, which enters oceans mainly from oil tankers and offshore oil wells. Such spills ruin beaches and kill birds and marine life.

Soil pollution damages the thin layer of fertile soil that covers much of the earth's land and is essential for growing food. Natural processes took thousands of years to form the soil that supports crops. But, through poor treatment, people can destroy soil in a few years.

In nature, cycles similar to those that keep water clean work to keep soil fertile. Plant and animal wastes, including dead organisms, accumu­late in the soil. Bacteria and fungi decay these wastes, breaking them down into nitrates, phosphates, and other nutrients. The nutrients feed growing plants, and when the plants die the cycle begins again.

People use fertilizers and pesticides to grow more and better crops. Fertilizers add extra nutrients to the soil and increase the amount of a crop that can be grown on an area of land. But the use of large amounts of fertilizer may decrease the ability of bacteria to decay wastes and pro­duce nutrients naturally.

Pesticides destroy weeds and insects that harm crops. But pesticides may also harm bacteria and other helpful organisms in the soil.

Solid wastes are probably the most visible forms of pollution. People throw away billions of tons of solid material each year. Much of this waste ends up littering roadsides, floating in lakes and streams, and col­lecting in ugly dumps. Examples of solid wastes include junked automo­biles, tires, refrigerators, and stoves; cans and other packaging materials; and scraps of metal, paper, and plastic. Such solid pollutants are most common in the heavily populated areas in and near cities. Slag and other wastes from mining processes pollute much land away from cities.

Solid wastes present a serious problem because most of the methods used to dispose of them result in some type of damage to the environ­ment. When the wastes are put into open dumps, they ruin the attractive­ness of the surrounding areas. Dumps also provide homes for disease-carrying animals, such as cockroaches and rats. Some solid wastes can be destroyed by burning them. But burning produces smoke that causes air pollution. When wastes are dumped in water, they contribute to various forms of water pollution.

In the mid-1980's, more than 2 billion short tons (1.8 billion metric tons) of solid wastes were produced in the United States each year. Solid wastes include mining, industrial, and agricultural wastes, in addition to household wastes. Most solid wastes are buried in large, open areas called landfills. But in many places, especially near large cities, the land avail­able for dumping is running out. In the meantime, the production of solid wastes is increasing rapidly. In addition, more and more wastes that are difficult to dispose of are being produced. Tin and steel cans that rust and can be absorbed by the soil have been replaced by aluminum cans that stay in their original state for many years. Paper and cardboard packag­ing that can decay and burn easily is being replaced by plastics that will not decay and that give off harmful gases when burned.

 

CAUSES OF POLLUTION

 

New inventions and processes have been continuously developed to improve our way of life. Such developments are called technological ad­vances. Technological advances help us, but many of them also bring about harm to the environment. In addition, there are economic and so­cial causes of pollution.

Technological causes. Many environmental pollution problems are a result of the rapid advances in technology that have been made since about the end of World War II (1945). Technological advances in agri­culture, industry, and transportation have greatly improved our way of life. But most of the advances were made without consideration of the effects they would have on the environment.

The automobile engine is an example of a very useful technological development that harms the environment. Through the years, automo­biles have been made more and more powerful. Many cars being built today have two to three times as much power as most cars built during the 1940s. Because of this, the new cars produce much more polluting exhaust than the older ones did. In order to make engines more powerful, automobile manufacturers increased the pressure andas a resultthe temperature at which combustion takes place in the engines' cylinders. The higher temperatures during combustion cause chemical reactions that put large amounts of nitrogen oxide gases into the engines' exhausts. In addition, high compression engines require special gasoline's that burn evenly to prevent "knocking" noises. Mechanisms called catalytic con­verters now remove some of the polluting materials produced by auto­mobile engines. Also, the gradual elimination of the lead from gasoline has helped make automobiles less polluting. However, there is still much to do to eliminate pollution from automobiles. An increase in their num­ber may cancel gains from using catalytic converters and unleaded gaso­line.

The sewage treatment plant is an example of a technological develop­ment that was designed to protect the environment, but which can cause pollution nevertheless. Most treatment plants prevent dangerous organic wastes (wastes from animal and plant matter) from upsetting the natural cycles in water. The treatment plants use bacteria and oxygen to break down the organic wastes and turn them into inorganic nutrients. But when the nutrients are put into the water, they upset natural cycles by increas­ing the growth of algae. Scientists and engineers are working to develop sewage treatment plants that will also remove inorganic nutrients from sewage.

Some products of advanced technology contribute to environmental pollution in more than one way. For example, plastics are a troublesome solid waste because they will not break down and cannot be absorbed by the soil. Plastics also indirectly cause pollution when they are produced. Large amounts of electricity are required in order to produce plastics. As a result of this need for electricity, the production of plastics helps create a demand for more electric power plants. Electric power plants that burn fuel, such as coal, are a major source of air pollution.

 

CONTROLLING POLLUTION

 

Some lakes and rivers may already be so badly polluted that they may not be able to regain their health even if all pollution is stopped. Some soil has been too badly eroded to support crops any more. But in most areas, effective programs to prevent pollution could greatly improve en­vironmental conditions.

Several different approaches can be used to control pollution. Waste products can be saved and used again. New technological developments can help prevent pollution from older ones. Restrictions can be placed on the use of materials that pollute. These approaches may result in less convenience and higher costs, however.

Recycling. The reprocessing of waste products for reuse is called recy­cling. Many kinds of wastes can be recycled. Some, including cans and newspapers, can be used over and over again for the same purposes. Cans can be melted down and used to make new cans. Old newspapers can be turned into pulp and then made into clean newsprint. Other materials, such as glass bottles and automobile tires, can be reused for other pur­poses. Ground-up glass can serve as an ingredient in road-building mate­rials. Old tires can be melted down in a special process in which they give off valuable chemicals, such as oil and gas. Many communities have in­troduced programs that encourage households to sort their trash for re­cycling. Recycling programs can reduce the amount of solid wastes that must be dumped or burned.

New technological developments do much to control pollution caused by older technology. For example, several types of devices have been developed to prevent particulates from leaving industrial smokestacks. These devices include filters that trap particulates that would otherwise be released into the air with waste gases. Other devices use static electric­ity to keep particulates from escaping into the air. Still other devices wash out particulates with chemical sprays.

Various methods of reducing pollution from automobile engines have been developed. Examples include new additives to replace tetraethyl lead in gasoline, and devices to remove pollutants from exhaust and make combustion processes more complete.

An important development in agriculture is the use of biological con­trols instead of pesticides. Biological controls involve the use of various types of insects and bacteria to control pests. Other new developments have improved the effectiveness of water treatment facilities and provided new ways to dispose of solid wastes.

Restrictions on the use of materials that pollute can be extremely ef­fective in controlling pollution. But the restrictions may also cause incon­venience and require changes in ways of life.

The use of some harmful materials has been stopped or reduced with­out major problems resulting. For example, most industrial countries have banned the use of the dangerous pesticide DOT for all except es­sential purposes. Farmers have found other, less harmful pesticides to replace DDT. Oil companies now produce unleaded gasoline because lead was found to be a major pollutant in automobile exhausts. Auto­mobile manufacturers have modified engines so that the engines can run properly on unleaded gasoline.

 

Tasks: Riley A. Law Book: Professional English. – London, 1999.

           Units 5,7.

 

Lesson 37 Lexico-Grammar Test

 

Lessons 38,39 Revision

 

 

T E R M  VI

 

Topic: MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS OF UKRAINE

Lessons 1-5

 

MINISTER AND EXACUTIVES OF THE MINISTRY

 

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine is run by the Minister with assistance of the State Secretary, State Secretary for European In­tegration and Assistant State Secretaries.

Everyday activities of the number one executive of the agency are secured by the Minister's Private Office.

The average age of personnel in the Minister's Office is thirty. Its nine staff members speak a total of some 30 foreign languages. Almost each of them has experience of a long-term mission abroad.

The office studies and prepares materials for meetings and negotiations that the Minister will be attending; it also oversees implementation of his decisions and instructions. Every day over a hundred documents is submitted for the Minister's signature.

Rapid Response Center (RRC) operates at the Minister's Private Office. This subdivision was cre­ated to increase the efficiency of the Ministry's response to international events, monitor crises and emergencies, and ensure rapid and effective protection of the rights and interests of Ukrainian nationals abroad. Rapid Response Center is working 24 hours a day. Several times a day the Center prepares status reports on the most recent international developments, studies latest news reports by the world news agencies and analyses information from Ukrainian consu­lar and diplomatic missions overseas.

The Center operates in close coordina­tion with the subdivisions of the Ministry of De­fense, Ministry of Interior, Ministry for Emer­gencies, Security Service and other government agencies.

State Protocol Department is regarded as one of the most responsible areas in any foreign service. Its work is closely related to the Minister and the Ministry's executives.

This Department is in charge of preparing and running visits of the Ukrainian government del­egations headed by the Foreign Minister abroad. It acts in close cooperation with the protocol services of the President, Cabinet of Ministers and Verkhovna Rada in respect to visits of foreign delegations to Ukraine.

State Protocol Department maintains good working contacts and correspondence with foreign diplomatic missions accredited in Ukraine.

The Department is also in charge accredita­tion of foreign diplomatic corps representatives, as well as protection of privileges and immunities of foreign diplomats and diplomatic missions.

The Department assists pre­sentation of credentials to the President and the pre­sentation of copies of credentials to the Minister by foreign ambassadors as well as granting exequaturs to foreign honorary consuls. It renders assistance in organizing meetings of the heads of foreign diplo­matic missions with high-ranking Ukrainian officials, MFA top executives Minister, State Secretaries and Assistant State Secretaries as well as other government executives.

The Minister's working day begins with the meeting with the Press Service Chief who briefs him on the latest developments in the world based on foreign media reports.

Press Service is a comparatively young subdivi­sion at the Ministry. It started operating in 1999, after the reorganization of the Information Department.

Major objectives of the Press Service are to provide infor­mation on both Ukraine’s foreign policy and day-to-day work of the Ministry of Foreign Af­fairs to the public in Ukraine and abroad. The service works closely with the representa­tives of Ukrainian and foreign media.

Press Service prepares and disseminates MFA official messages, hosts weekly briefings, ar­ranges media coverage for the visits of foreign officials to the country, as well as oversea visits of the MFA executives.

If necessary, this office creates and supports field press centers, makes arrangements for interviews and publications of the Ministry top executives, accredits representatives of foreign media in Ukraine and assists with their work.

Press Club, opened at MFA in 2001 proved to make a difference as a new format of communication with the media.

 

Tasks: Riley A. Law Book: Professional English. – London, 1999.

            Units 8.

 

 

Topic: INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS

Lessons 7-14

 

THE UNITED NATIONS

 

PURPOSES AND PRINCIPLES

 

The United Nations has been aptly described as a Standing Diplomatic Conference: it is a worldwide association of states which, on signing the Charter of the United Nations, subscribe to its purposes and agree to act in accordance with its principles; these are:      

 

PURPOSES

 

I. To maintain international peace and security, and to that end: to take effective collective measures for the prevention and removal of threats to the peace, and for the suppression of' acts of aggression or other breaches of the peace, and to bring about by peaceful means, and in conformity with the principles of justice and international law, adjustment or settlement of international disputes or situations which might lead to a breach of the peace;

II. To develop friendly relations among nations based on respect for the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples, and to take other appropriate measures to strengthen universal peace;

III. To achieve international cooperation in solving international problems of an economic, social, cultural, or humanitarian character, and in promoting and encouraging respect for human rights and for fundamental freedoms for all without distinction as to race, sex, language, or religion; and

IV. To be a centre for harmonizing the actions of nations in the attainment of these common ends.

 

PRINCIPLES

 

². United Nations is based on the principle of the sovereign equality of all its members.

²². All members, in order to ensure to all of them the rights and benefits resulting from membership, shall fulfill in good faith the obligations assumed by them in accordance with the Charter.

²²². All members shall settle their international disputes by peaceful means in such a manner that international peace and security, and justice, are not endangered.

²V. All members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations.

V. All members shall give the United Nations every assistance in any action it takes in accordance with the Charter, and shall refrain from giving assistance to any state against which the United Nations is taking a preventive or enforcement action.

V². The United Nations shall ensure that states which are not members of the Organisation act in accordance with these Principles so far as may be necessary for the maintenance of international peace and security.

V²². Nothing contained in the Charter shall authorise the United Nations to intervene in matters which are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any state or shall require the members to submit such matters to settlement under the Charter; but this principle shall not prejudice the application of enforcement measures under chapter VII.          

 

THE UNITED NATIONS CHARTER

 

Membership of the United Nations consists of the “original members” (those states that signed the Washington Declaration in 1942 or took part in the United Nations Conference on International Organization in San Francisco in 1945, and signed and ratified the Charter in accordance with the prescribed procedure); and those states subsequently accepted as members in accordance with the provisions of the Charter.

Membership is further open to all other 'peace-loving' states which accept the obligations contained in the Charter and, in the judgment of the United Nations, are able and willing to carry them out. The admission of new members is dependent on the approval of the General Assembly on the recommendation of the Security Council.

A member which has persistently violated the principles of the Charter may be expelled from the United Nations by the General.

Assembly on the recommendation of the Security Council; or may have its rights and privileges of membership suspended by the General Assembly on the recommendation of the Security Council if it has been the object of preventive or enforcement action taken by the Security Council. These rights and privileges, however, may be restored by the Security Council.

Each state is entitled to one vote in the General Assembly and in its dependent committees and councils.

Provision is made in chapter XVIII for amendments to the Char­ter, and these come into force when they have been (a) adopted by a vote of two-thirds of the members of the General Assembly, and (b) ratified in accordance with their respective constitutional processes by two-thirds of the members of the Security Council. The procedure is the same if a General Conference of the members of the United Nations is convened in terms of article 109 for the purpose of reviewing the Charter, except that the requirement for the initial vote (prior to ratification) is a two-thirds majority of those present at the Conference.

The official languages of the United Nations are Arabic, Chinese, English, French, Russian and Spanish.

The United Nations, in terms of its Charter, is based on six principal organs: the General Assembly, the Security Council, the Economic and Social Council, the Trusteeship Council, the International Court of Justice, and the Secretariat. Generally speaking the Assembly and Security Council are the political and legislative bodies; ECOSOC and the Trusteeship Council are specialist bodies dependent on the General Assembly, and the International Court of Justice an independent body.

 

Tasks: Riley A. Law Book: Professional English. – London, 1999.

            Units 10,11.

 

Topic: UKRAINE’S FOREIGN POLICY

Lessons 15-18

 

FOREIGN POLICY OF UKRAINE

 

A new development stage of Ukraine’s foreign service started on 16 July 1990, when Verkhovna Rada of the UkrSSR adopted the Declaration of State Sovereignty of Ukraine.

The Declaration stated that Ukraine "as a subject of international law shall establish direct relations with other states, conclude agreements, ex­change diplomatic, consular and trade missions, par­ticipate in international organizations...". Ukraine "shall act as an equal party in interna­tional relations, actively promote world peace and international security, and di­rectly participate in the all-European process and Euro­pean organizations".

After the historic Act of Independence of Ukraine was adopted on 24 August 1991, the national Ministry of Foreign Affairs faced new challenges. Ukraine needed recognition by the world commu­nity. It also needed to establish diplomatic relations, create an effective network of its own diplomatic and consu­lar missions, establish full-scale bilateral relations with foreign countries, acquire membership and be­come a full-fledged member of the leading international organizations.

It is a major achievement of Ukrainian diplomacy that in 11 years of the country's independence it has achieved positive results in all of those important ar­eas.

In 11 years of independence Ukraine was recognized by over 170 foreign states. It has established and pursues good diplomatic relations with almost all of them. Ukraine hosts the mis­sions of 134 foreign countries and international organi­zations.

Today, the Foreign Ministry has the staff of over 1,800 employees, which is 18 times as many as in 1990. Training new generations of Ukrainian diplomats is of paramount importance to the agency. MFA personnel comes mainly from the following higher educational institutions: Diplomatic Academy at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine, Interna­tional Relations School at Taras Shevchenko Kyiv Na­tional University, Ivan Franko L'viv National Univer­sity, Yaroslav Mudry National Law Acad­emy of Ukraine and the "Kharkiv Collegium" Institute of Eastern Studies and International Relations.

Today Ukraine is a member of over 90 interna­tional organizations and a signatory to over 2,000 international legal documents.

On 2 July 1993, the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine approved the "Major Guidelines for Ukraine's Foreign Policy" that contain recommendations and guidelines for the government and its agencies, oversea dip­lomatic and consular missions of Ukraine, and other government institutions involved in foreign policy implementation.

Ukraine conducts a well-weighed and consistent foreign policy and its major priorities in general remain the same since independence was proclaimed in 1991.

Ukraine is consistently building its foreign policy in strict adherence to the principles of international law, UN Charter and other international legal acts. Such a standpoint of the country is supported in "Major Guidelines for Ukraine's Foreign Policy» approved by Verkhovna Rada on July 2, 1993. This is a conceptual document that lays out groundwork for Ukraine’s foreign policy.

At present Ukraine’s foreign policy sets out the following three main areas:

1) development of bilateral interstate relations;

2) European integration;

3) multilateral diplomacy.

There are two priorities for Ukrainian diplomacy in its bilateral relations:

·  relations with neighboring countries;

·  relations with strategic partners and countries of influence.

European integration first of all means:

·  further political and institutional collaboration with EU and gradual advancement to the ultimate goal of Ukraine’s integration into EU;

·  adaptation of Ukrainian legislation to the standards of EU and Council of Europe as a key integration element;

·  intensification of relations with NATO as one of the components of the overall system of European stability and safety.

The following foreign policy priorities can be set out for multilateral diplomacy:

·  continuing effective participation in international organizations;

·  establishing effective regional and local cooperation, enforcing the role of Ukraine in regional and local organizations, forums and associations;

·  animating the activity within multilateral agreements on disarmament, including nuclear weapons, actions of confidence, peacemaking and peacekeeping operations, safety regimes and control mechanisms.

 

Tasks: Riley A. Law Book: Professional English. – London, 1999.

            Units 11,12

 

Lesson 19 Lexico-Grammar Test.

 

Lesson 20 Revision.